Validator report
26 February 2025
PRA-Solefield School-TN13 1PH-26/Feb/2025
Areas for further development
Look at the various suggestions for collecting evidence included in the Award guidance and consider which would be most useful in your setting. There is clearly some excellent work going on but we need to see more tangible evidence of its impact. I hope you will decide to have another go at achieving the Award as I think it would enable you to more fully evaluate the effectiveness of some really thoughtful provision and inform its further development.
Award term ref
Confirm the recommendation
1
Overall comments
There are some great examples of provision and it is clear that pupils enjoy many of the activities but the evidence doesn’t include very much on how they are helping to develop children’s knowledge and skills. It’s difficult to know from the evidence provided whether they are becoming more resilient as a result of what is happening at school. As well as the suggestions above, you could also consider collecting more feedback from staff about changes they have noticed as a result of introducing specific initiatives such as Zones of Regulation or mindfulness activities.
School ref
Validator benchmark comments
Comments on impact identified during validation
There are couple of nice examples of children’s work here showing an impact on knowledge and skills. You could further evidence this benchmark by surveying children about what has helped them to develop resilience – for example, what strategies do they employ to help them persist with something difficult. Also consider including evidence from your behaviour tracker to show developing trends and / or the progress of individuals.
Comments on impact identified during validation
Again, there are some nice examples of work here but much of the children’s feedback focuses on how much they enjoyed the sessions rather than about what they learned. You might want to think about asking different questions or, perhaps, discussing the sessions in a focus group so that you can explore their responses a bit more. It’s good to hear that you have seen changes in their work and language but I would like to see some tangible evidence of this – perhaps from staff surveys or baseline assessments like the example included in the guidance.
Benchmarks ref
Comments on impact identified during validation
It was good to see the degree to which children are involved in planning work in this area but I also need to see that it has had an impact on their understanding or behaviour. Could you encourage older children to monitor and report on their mobile phone use? The questionnaires are interesting but I am concerned that the facetious nature of some of the suggested responses is actually pointing children towards the ‘correct’ answer rather than testing what they understand is appropriate in different situations.
Benchmarks ref
Comments on impact identified during validation
There are some great examples of provision here but, apart from an example of one child’s work and a single case study, we don’t have any evidence of impact. You could ask teachers what impact Zones of Regulation have had on behaviour generally or note increases in children coming forward to ask for support. Discuss with pupils which strategies they use to support their own wellbeing - and why they fine them effective - and record their feedback. Again, consider using surveys, behaviour records etc to back up your positive impressions.
Benchmarks ref
Comments on impact identified during validation
While pupil feedback shows that they enjoyed these sessions, there is little evidence of their impact on knowledge or skills. It would be good to hear more about how pupils feel about money and what it is for. What did the impact of running a ‘shop’ have on their understanding of budgeting etc? The focus on entrepreneurship is interesting but I am not clear how this has contributed to their understanding of how to manage money in daily life.
Comments on impact identified during validation
There is some helpful feedback from the residential here but otherwise there are examples of provision but not of impact. It would be helpful to collect similar kinds of feedback for more trips and activities. Focus on identifying development of knowledge and skills as much as enjoyment. See also the suggested examples in the Award guidance – for example, conducting baselines assessment of attitudes to risk and comparing these with evaluations after children have taken part in significant activities would be helpful in showing which interventions are effective and why.
Benchmarks ref
Comments on impact identified during validation
Again, consider conducting baseline assessments and repeat these over time. Also, when evaluating particular initiatives, seek to identify – perhaps through the use of focus groups or individual case studies - what helped children to repeat or persist with challenge, what specifically did they find difficult and how did they overcome it etc.
Benchmarks ref
Comments on impact identified during validation
It was good to see examples of the mental health scales used to identify children who need extra support. The impact of this could be evidenced through case studies. They could also be used to note evolving trends over time and assess whether whole school initiatives are having an impact on identified concerns. Behaviour analyses would also be useful in evidencing this benchmark, as well as safeguarding records, observations of discussions in PSHE, focus group discussions, case studies etc.
Validator recommendation
I recommend that the school is not accredited for this award
Validation confirm date
26/Feb/2025
Product attribute ref
Gold
